Many investors are not aware of how they can lessen their tax burden through this practice. This is done through implementing tax strategies which aim at reducing property owners tax burden. One of the powerful tax strategies to reduce burden today is cost segregation depreciation.
The benefit of this practice include gradual cash flow increase, cutting down tax liability, leads to tax deferral and individuals can claim refunds on tax overcharge paid in the previous years without changing their tax return.
There are many techniques that can be used to classify and depreciate the assets, this techniques are sampling technique, scrap value estimation approach, survey approach, detailed engineering and modeling approach.
The frequently used techniques for segregation of outlay include detailed engineering technique which is based from initial expenditure records, letter approach also known as survey technique, residue estimation method and finally modeling or sampling method.
The next stage is verifying the nature of the asset and evaluating its intended purpose. Sometimes it may require the auditor to take photos of the project for reference in the future if need be. Also photos of site previously constructed may be required for verification purposes and to monitor construction progress.
The detailed engineering technique has few vital steps that professionals ought to follow to achieve reliable and accurate results. The technique takes expenditure of that period of construction into consideration by using outlay records relating to the asset in coming up with amount to be depreciated.
Then apportion expenditure per unit to individual asset previously classified to get their total outlay. In case of any difference between the total definite expenditure and the quantitative charge, the difference is reconciled and the reason for the difference is investigated.
Scrap value is the amount a property can be sold at or fetch at the end of it useful life. Then reducing balance method is a technique that depreciates an asset yearly. The depreciation charge in the first year reduces the initial outlay of asset in the following year. The asset is depreciated year by year until its economic life is over.
This approach is more suitable for assets that short life span, that is an economic useful life of less than seven years and greater than five years. The cost of these short term asset are added up and then deducted from actual outlay of project.
Thoroughly counter checking of blueprints, contracts, documents for bid, payment request from suppliers and specifications for verification. Prepare take offs quantitatively for the entire material used in construction and utilize records for payments to calculate unit costs. Recognize and allocate specific items from the project to their respective classes such as buildings, land, equipment, fixtures and fittings and other non current assets.
The approach also fails to reconcile the project actual cost with the quantitative value. It is an unreasonable approach to use since a proper approach will add back residual cost to the total cost of short term asset.
The benefit of this practice include gradual cash flow increase, cutting down tax liability, leads to tax deferral and individuals can claim refunds on tax overcharge paid in the previous years without changing their tax return.
There are many techniques that can be used to classify and depreciate the assets, this techniques are sampling technique, scrap value estimation approach, survey approach, detailed engineering and modeling approach.
The frequently used techniques for segregation of outlay include detailed engineering technique which is based from initial expenditure records, letter approach also known as survey technique, residue estimation method and finally modeling or sampling method.
The next stage is verifying the nature of the asset and evaluating its intended purpose. Sometimes it may require the auditor to take photos of the project for reference in the future if need be. Also photos of site previously constructed may be required for verification purposes and to monitor construction progress.
The detailed engineering technique has few vital steps that professionals ought to follow to achieve reliable and accurate results. The technique takes expenditure of that period of construction into consideration by using outlay records relating to the asset in coming up with amount to be depreciated.
Then apportion expenditure per unit to individual asset previously classified to get their total outlay. In case of any difference between the total definite expenditure and the quantitative charge, the difference is reconciled and the reason for the difference is investigated.
Scrap value is the amount a property can be sold at or fetch at the end of it useful life. Then reducing balance method is a technique that depreciates an asset yearly. The depreciation charge in the first year reduces the initial outlay of asset in the following year. The asset is depreciated year by year until its economic life is over.
This approach is more suitable for assets that short life span, that is an economic useful life of less than seven years and greater than five years. The cost of these short term asset are added up and then deducted from actual outlay of project.
Thoroughly counter checking of blueprints, contracts, documents for bid, payment request from suppliers and specifications for verification. Prepare take offs quantitatively for the entire material used in construction and utilize records for payments to calculate unit costs. Recognize and allocate specific items from the project to their respective classes such as buildings, land, equipment, fixtures and fittings and other non current assets.
The approach also fails to reconcile the project actual cost with the quantitative value. It is an unreasonable approach to use since a proper approach will add back residual cost to the total cost of short term asset.
No comments:
Post a Comment